Makes›Mercury›Mariner

Mercury Mariner

7 model years from 2005 to 2011, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

Model years
2005–2011
Class
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
Latest engines
2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl
Best MPG
21–32 combined, by year
Latest rating
Not rated
Recalls
4 campaigns, all years
Most complaints
2008 (376)

The 2011 Mariner in brief

The 2011 Mercury Mariner is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl), including a hybrid version and front-wheel drive, 4-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 32 MPG combined (34 city / 30 highway), 53% better than the 2011 SUV - average of 20.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,100 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

It has 2 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 46 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the steering.

The Mercury Mariner has 7 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2011, classed as Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD.

Its most efficient year was 2011 at 32 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 21 to 32 MPG.

Owners most often report problems with the steering (500), power train (78), service brakes (76).

2008 has the most recalls (3); all years together count 4 campaigns and 863 owner complaints.

How the 2005 Mariner compares

The 2005 Mercury Mariner is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.3L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 21 MPG combined (19 city / 24 highway), 17% better than the 2005 SUV - average of 18 MPG, for an estimated $3,200 a year in fuel.

2011 Mariner pros & cons

Full 2011 details →

What's good

  • Excellent fuel economyUp to 32 MPG combined — 53% better than the average 2011 SUV - (20.9 MPG).
  • Hybrid version availableOffered as a hybrid as well as gas.
  • AWD / 4WD available
  • Few owner complaints46 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 137 for similar models.

Watch out for

No weak spots against similar models in the data.

Mariner changes by model year

  1. 2009
    • Engine added: 2.5L 4-cyl
    • Engine dropped: 2.3L 4-cyl
  2. 2008
    • Best combined MPG up from 27 to 32
  3. 2006
    • New hybrid version
    • Best combined MPG up from 21 to 27

Years without a measurable change are left out.

Show all 7 model years side by side
YearLatest enginesBest MPG / rangeLengthWeightOverallRecallsComplaints
20112.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl32 MPG––Not rated246
20102.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl32 MPG––Not rated2138
20092.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl32 MPG––Not rated1224
20082.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl32 MPG––Not rated3376
20072.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl27 MPG––Not rated221
20062.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl27 MPG––Not rated238
20052.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl21 MPG––Not rated120
Best combined MPG by model year — Mercury Mariner
2005: 21 MPG2006: 27 MPG2007: 27 MPG2008: 32 MPG2009: 32 MPG2010: 32 MPG2011: 32 MPG2005200620072008200920102011max 32 MPG

Alternatives to the 2011 Mariner

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2011 Toyota Land Cruiser15 MPGNot rated5
2011 Toyota RAV424 MPGNot rated11
2011 Honda CR-V24 MPGNot rated13
2011 Toyota 4Runner19 MPGNot rated10
2011 Chevrolet Suburban17 MPGNot rated5
2011 Ford Explorer20 MPGNot rated6

Most common owner-reported problems

Steering500
Power Train78
Service Brakes76
Electrical System71
Engine68
Fuel/Propulsion System64
Unknown Or Other51
Vehicle Speed Control29
Owner complaints by model year — Mercury Mariner
2005: 202006: 382007: 212008: 3762009: 2242010: 1382011: 462005200620072008200920102011max 376
Check your VIN for open recalls ↗

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercury. How we calculate this →