Mercury Mariner
7 model years from 2005 to 2011, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2011
- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
- Latest engines
- 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 21–32 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 4 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2008 (376)
The 2011 Mariner in brief
The 2011 Mercury Mariner is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl), including a hybrid version and front-wheel drive, 4-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 32 MPG combined (34 city / 30 highway), 53% better than the 2011 SUV - average of 20.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,100 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 2 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 46 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the steering.
The Mercury Mariner has 7 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2011, classed as Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD.
Its most efficient year was 2011 at 32 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 21 to 32 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the steering (500), power train (78), service brakes (76).
2008 has the most recalls (3); all years together count 4 campaigns and 863 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Mariner compares
The 2005 Mercury Mariner is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.3L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 21 MPG combined (19 city / 24 highway), 17% better than the 2005 SUV - average of 18 MPG, for an estimated $3,200 a year in fuel.
2011 Mariner pros & cons
Full 2011 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 32 MPG combined — 53% better than the average 2011 SUV - (20.9 MPG).
- Hybrid version availableOffered as a hybrid as well as gas.
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints46 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 137 for similar models.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Mariner changes by model year
- 2009
- Engine added: 2.5L 4-cyl
- Engine dropped: 2.3L 4-cyl
- 2008
- Best combined MPG up from 27 to 32
- 2006
- New hybrid version
- Best combined MPG up from 21 to 27
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 7 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 32 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 2 | 46 |
| 2010 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 32 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 2 | 138 |
| 2009 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 32 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 1 | 224 |
| 2008 | 2.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 32 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 3 | 376 |
| 2007 | 2.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 27 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 2 | 21 |
| 2006 | 2.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 27 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 2 | 38 |
| 2005 | 2.3L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 1 | 20 |
Alternatives to the 2011 Mariner
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser | 15 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2011 Toyota RAV4 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 11 |
| 2011 Honda CR-V | 24 MPG | Not rated | 13 |
| 2011 Toyota 4Runner | 19 MPG | Not rated | 10 |
| 2011 Chevrolet Suburban | 17 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2011 Ford Explorer | 20 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercury. How we calculate this →