Makes›Mazda›3›2013

2013 Mazda 3

Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2013 models.

Mazda 3
Pictured: Mazda3 SKYACTIV-G. Photo: TTTNIS, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
Class
Compact Cars
Engines
2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl
Drivetrain
Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel
Regular Gasoline
MPG (best)
32 combined · 28 city / 39 hwy
Length
–
Curb weight
–
NHTSA rating
Not rated
Recalls
0 campaigns

Pros & cons

What's good

  • Excellent fuel economyUp to 32 MPG combined — 24% better than the average 2013 compact car (25.9 MPG).
  • Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 90 for similar models.
  • No recalls so far

Watch out for

No weak spots against similar models in the data.

Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 24 similar 2013 models — not a review. How we calculate this →

Overview

The 2013 Mazda 3 is a compact car offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl and 2.5L 4-cyl) and front-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 32 MPG combined (28 city / 39 highway), 24% better than the 2013 compact car average of 25.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,100 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.

What changed for 2013

No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2012 3 — a carry-over year in the data.

Compared with 2012; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2012 3 →

Engines, MPG & running costs

VersionEngineTransmissionDriveCity / Hwy / Combvs. classFuel / yrCO₂ g/mi
3 DI 4-Door2.0L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive28 / 39 / 32+24%$2,100277
3 DI 5-Door2.0L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive28 / 37 / 31+23%$2,150283
3 DI 4-Door2.0L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive26 / 37 / 30+16%$2,250293
3 DI 5-Door2.0L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive26 / 37 / 30+19%$2,250294
32.0L 4-cylManual 5-spdFront-Wheel Drive25 / 32 / 28+8%$2,400313
32.0L 4-cylAutomatic (S5)Front-Wheel Drive24 / 32 / 27+4%$2,500326
32.5L 4-cylAutomatic (S5)Front-Wheel Drive22 / 28 / 25-3%$2,700356
32.5L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive20 / 28 / 23-11%$2,900377
8/10EPA fuel economy score (best version)
8/10EPA greenhouse gas score
Save $1,500Fuel over 5 years vs. average new car
25.9 MPG2013 Compact Cars average

EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2013 EPA class average. How we calculate this →

Safety ratings & technology

NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2013 Mazda 3.

Similar 2013 compact cars

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2013 Mazda 3 (this car)32 MPGNot rated0
2013 Toyota Corolla29 MPGNot rated5
2013 Honda Civic44 MPGNot rated0
2013 Volkswagen Golf/GTI32 MPGNot rated5
2013 Subaru Impreza/Outback Sport30 MPGNot rated0
2013 Toyota Yaris33 MPGNot rated1
2013 Ford Focus32 MPGNot rated14

Recalls (0)

No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2013 Mazda 3.

Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗

Not every 2013 Mazda 3 is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.

Owner-reported problems

No owner complaints for the 2013 Mazda 3 in NHTSA's database since 2015.

Used 2013 Mazda 3 buyer's checklist

  1. Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
  2. Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.

Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2013 Mazda 3. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.

YearMPG (best)LengthOverallRecallsComplaints
2026 330–Not rated00
2025 331–Not rated00
2024 331–Not rated00
2023 331–Not rated00
2022 331–Not rated00
2021 331–Not rated00
2020 330–Not rated00
2019 330–Not rated00
2018 332–Not rated00
2017 332–Not rated00
2016 333–Not rated00
2015 333–Not rated00

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →