Makes›Mazda›3›2015

2015 Mazda 3

Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2015 models.

Mazda 3
Pictured: Mazda3 SKYACTIV-G. Photo: TTTNIS, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
Class
Compact Cars
Engines
2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl
Drivetrain
Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel
Regular Gasoline
MPG (best)
33 combined · 30 city / 40 hwy
Length
–
Curb weight
–
NHTSA rating
Not rated
Recalls
0 campaigns

Pros & cons

What's good

  • Excellent fuel economyUp to 33 MPG combined — 25% better than the average 2015 compact car (26.3 MPG).
  • Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 52 for similar models.
  • No recalls so far

Watch out for

No weak spots against similar models in the data.

Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 22 similar 2015 models — not a review. How we calculate this →

Overview

The 2015 Mazda 3 is a compact car offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl and 2.5L 4-cyl) and front-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 33 MPG combined (30 city / 40 highway), 25% better than the 2015 compact car average of 26.3 MPG, for an estimated $2,050 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.

What changed for 2015

No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2014 3 — a carry-over year in the data.

Compared with 2014; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2014 3 →

Engines, MPG & running costs

VersionEngineTransmissionDriveCity / Hwy / Combvs. classFuel / yrCO₂ g/mi
3 4-Door2.0L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive29 / 39 / 33+25%$2,050270
3 4-Door2.0L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive30 / 40 / 33+25%$2,050266
3 5-Door2.0L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive29 / 39 / 33+28%$2,050270
3 4-Door2.5L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive29 / 39 / 32+22%$2,100276
3 5-Door2.0L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive29 / 39 / 32+25%$2,100275
3 5-Door2.5L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive28 / 38 / 32+25%$2,100280
3 4-Door2.5L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive28 / 38 / 31+18%$2,150282
3 5-Door2.5L 4-cylAutomatic (S6)Front-Wheel Drive27 / 36 / 30+17%$2,250293
3 4-Door2.5L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive25 / 36 / 29+10%$2,300308
3 5-Door2.5L 4-cylManual 6-spdFront-Wheel Drive25 / 34 / 29+13%$2,300310
8/10EPA fuel economy score (best version)
8/10EPA greenhouse gas score
Save $1,750Fuel over 5 years vs. average new car
26.3 MPG2015 Compact Cars average

EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2015 EPA class average. How we calculate this →

Safety ratings & technology

NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2015 Mazda 3.

Similar 2015 compact cars

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2015 Mazda 3 (this car)33 MPGNot rated0
2015 Honda Civic44 MPG★★★★★1
2015 Volkswagen Golf/GTI35 MPG★★★★★12
2015 Subaru Impreza/Outback Sport31 MPGNot rated0
2015 Toyota Yaris33 MPG★★★★★4
2015 Ford Focus34 MPG★★★★★11
2015 Subaru WRX24 MPGNot rated3

Recalls (0)

No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2015 Mazda 3.

Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗

Not every 2015 Mazda 3 is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.

Owner-reported problems

No owner complaints for the 2015 Mazda 3 in NHTSA's database since 2015.

Used 2015 Mazda 3 buyer's checklist

  1. Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
  2. Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.

Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2015 Mazda 3. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.

YearMPG (best)LengthOverallRecallsComplaints
2026 330–Not rated00
2025 331–Not rated00
2024 331–Not rated00
2023 331–Not rated00
2022 331–Not rated00
2021 331–Not rated00
2020 330–Not rated00
2019 330–Not rated00
2018 332–Not rated00
2017 332–Not rated00
2016 333–Not rated00
2014 333–Not rated00

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →