Mazda MX-5
21 model years from 2006 to 2026, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2006–2026
- Class
- Two Seaters
- Latest engines
- 2.0L 4-cyl
- Best MPG
- 24–30 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 5 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2016 (34)
- Fewest problems
- 2015
- Interest
- 30,939 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2026 MX-5 in brief
The 2026 Mazda MX-5 is a two seaters offered with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive.
It measures about 154 inches long and 68 inches wide on a 91-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 2,348 lb (2dr Convertible).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 29 MPG combined (26 city / 35 highway), 55% better than the 2026 two seaters average of 18.7 MPG, for an estimated $2,850 a year in fuel.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 1 complaint with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the power train.
The Mazda MX-5 has 21 model years in our data, from 2006 to 2026.
Its most efficient year was 2023 at 30 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 24 to 30 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the power train (25), air bags (17), unknown or other (15).
Buying used? 2015 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2016 is the year to avoid.
2019 has the most recalls (3); all years together count 5 campaigns and 112 owner complaints.
How the 2006 MX-5 compares
The 2006 Mazda MX-5 is a two seaters offered with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 24 MPG combined (22 city / 28 highway), 29% better than the 2006 two seaters average of 18.6 MPG, for an estimated $3,400 a year in fuel.
About the Mazda MX-5
The Mazda MX-5 is a lightweight two-seat sports car manufactured and marketed by Mazda. While in most markets it is called the MX5, in Japan it is marketed as the Mazda Roadster or, previously, as the Eunos Roadster, and In the United States it is sold as the Mazda MX-5 Miata. The name miata derives from Old High German for "reward", and the MX-5 nameplate was derived from it being the fifth vehicle produced by the Mazda experimental division.
From the Wikipedia article "Mazda MX-5", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2026 MX-5 pros & cons
Full 2026 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 29 MPG combined — 55% better than the average 2026 two seaters (18.7 MPG).
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Best and worst years to buy used
2015 MX-5
1 owner complaint · 0 recalls
Year to avoid2016 MX-5
34 owner complaints · 3 recalls · 3 crash reports
Most reported: Power Train
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 10 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
MX-5 changes by model year
- 2016
- New body dimensions: 3.2 in shorter — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Best combined MPG up from 24 to 30
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 21 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 29 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 29 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 3 |
| 2024 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 29 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 5 |
| 2023 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 7 |
| 2022 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 5 |
| 2021 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 1 |
| 2020 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 1 | 3 |
| 2019 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,348 lb | Not rated | 3 | 11 |
| 2018 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 29 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,333 lb | Not rated | 3 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 29 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,333 lb | Not rated | 2 | 11 |
| 2016 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 153.9 in | 2,333 lb | Not rated | 3 | 34 |
| 2015 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,632 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,632 lb | Not rated | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,632 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,524 lb | Not rated | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,469 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,469 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,469 lb | Not rated | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,469 lb | Not rated | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 157.1 in | 2,469 lb | Not rated | 0 | 8 |
| 2006 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 5 |
Alternatives to the 2026 MX-5
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Nissan Z | 22 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2026 MINI Cooper | 32 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2026 Bugatti Rimac Nevera | 174 mi | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →
