Kia Sportage
23 model years from 2005 to 2027, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2027
- Class
- Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Latest engines
- 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl
- Best MPG
- 22–43 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2025)
- Recalls
- 23 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2017 (403)
- Fewest problems
- 2022
- Interest
- 18,177 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2026 Sportage in brief
The 2026 Kia Sportage is a small SUV offered with 2 engines (1.6L 4-cyl turbo and 2.5L 4-cyl), including a hybrid version and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
It measures about 184 inches long and 74 inches wide on a 109-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,618 lb (AWD 4dr SUV).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 42 MPG combined (41 city / 44 highway), 39% better than the 2026 small SUV average of 30.2 MPG, for an estimated $1,600 a year in fuel.
It has 1 recall campaign on file and owners have filed 40 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the unknown or other.
The Kia Sportage has 23 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2027, classed as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD.
Its most efficient year was 2025 at 43 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 43 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the engine (1,523), unknown or other (429), electrical system (427).
Buying used? 2022 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2017 is the year to avoid.
2023 has the most recalls (7); all years together count 23 campaigns and 2,967 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Sportage compares
The 2005 Kia Sportage is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 172 inches long and 71 inches wide on a 104-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,527 lb (4dr SUV AWD EX-V6).
About the Kia Sportage
The Kia Sportage is a compact SUV manufactured by the South Korean manufacturer Kia through five generations. At its launch in 1993, the nameplate was used for a vehicle produced under a joint venture with Mazda, and shared its platform with the Mazda Bongo.
From the Wikipedia article "Kia Sportage", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2026 Sportage pros & cons
Full 2026 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 42 MPG combined — 39% better than the average 2026 small SUV (30.2 MPG).
- Hybrid version availableOffered as a hybrid and plug-in hybrid as well as gas.
- AWD / 4WD available
- Lots of standard safety tech5 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2022 Sportage
46 owner complaints · 1 recall · 2 fire reports · 6 crash reports
NHTSA overall: ★★★★★
Year to avoid2017 Sportage
403 owner complaints · 4 recalls · 28 fire reports · 14 crash reports
Most reported: Engine
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 10 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
Sportage changes by model year
- 2023
- New body dimensions: 7.1 in longer, wheelbase +3.6 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New hybrid and plug-in hybrid versions
- Engines added: 1.6L 4-cyl turbo and 2.5L 4-cyl
- Engines dropped: 2.4L 4-cyl and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG up from 26 to 43
- 2018
- Now crash-tested by NHTSA: 5 stars overall
- 2017
- New body dimensions: 1.6 in longer, wheelbase +1.2 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Best combined MPG up from 23 to 26
- 2014
- Best combined MPG down from 25 to 23
- 2011
- New body dimensions: 2.8 in longer — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engines added: 2.4L 4-cyl and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Engines dropped: 2.0L 4-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 22 to 25
- 2006
- Lightest version 273 lb lighter
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 23 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 41 MPG | 184.3 in | 3,618 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 42 MPG | 184.3 in | 3,618 lb | Not rated | 1 | 40 |
| 2025 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 43 MPG | 183.5 in | 3,543 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 74 |
| 2024 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 43 MPG | 183.5 in | 3,543 lb | ★★★★★ | 3 | 110 |
| 2023 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 43 MPG | 183.5 in | 3,543 lb | ★★★★★ | 7 | 309 |
| 2022 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 46 |
| 2021 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 54 |
| 2020 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 164 |
| 2019 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 25 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 71 |
| 2018 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | ★★★★★ | 3 | 165 |
| 2017 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 176.4 in | 3,739 lb | Not rated | 4 | 403 |
| 2016 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,426 lb | Not rated | 2 | 134 |
| 2015 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,426 lb | Not rated | 2 | 146 |
| 2014 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.4L 4-cyl | 23 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,488 lb | Not rated | 3 | 123 |
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 25 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,488 lb | Not rated | 3 | 375 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 25 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,157 lb | Not rated | 5 | 376 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 25 MPG | 174.8 in | 3,157 lb | Not rated | 6 | 141 |
| 2010 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 2 | 17 |
| 2009 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 3 | 54 |
| 2008 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 3 | 62 |
| 2007 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 1 | 37 |
| 2006 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 0 | 41 |
| 2005 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,527 lb | Not rated | 0 | 24 |
Alternatives to the 2026 Sportage
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Toyota RAV4 | 43 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Honda CR-V | 40 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Hyundai Tucson | 38 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2026 Subaru Forester | 35 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2026 Mazda CX-5 | 26 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 23 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Kia. How we calculate this →



