Chevrolet Malibu
21 model years from 2005 to 2025, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2025
- Class
- Midsize Cars
- Latest engines
- 1.5L 4-cyl turbo
- Best MPG
- 24–46 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2025)
- Recalls
- 41 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2009 (1,140)
- Fewest problems
- 2023
- Interest
- 20,204 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2025 Malibu in brief
The 2025 Chevrolet Malibu is a midsize car offered with a 1.5L 4-cyl turbo engine and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 194 inches long and 73 inches wide on a 111-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,126 lb (Ls/RS/Lt 4dr Sedan).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 31 MPG combined (28 city / 36 highway), 3% better than the 2025 midsize car average of 30 MPG, for an estimated $2,150 a year in fuel.
In NHTSA crash testing it earned the top 5-star overall rating.
It has 1 recall campaign on file and owners have filed 12 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the unknown or other.
The Chevrolet Malibu has 21 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2025.
Its most efficient year was 2019 at 46 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 24 to 46 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the steering (2,804), electrical system (2,632), engine (1,923).
Buying used? 2024 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2016 is the year to avoid.
2013 has the most recalls (11); all years together count 41 campaigns and 10,063 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Malibu compares
The 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is a midsize car offered with 2 engines (2.2L 4-cyl and 3.5L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 188 inches long and 70 inches wide on a 106-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,175 lb (4dr Sedan FWD Base).
About the Chevrolet Malibu
The Chevrolet Malibu is a mid-size car manufactured and marketed by Chevrolet from 1964 to 1983 and from 1997 to 2025. The Malibu began as a trim-level of the Chevrolet Chevelle before becoming its own model line in 1978. Originally a rear-wheel-drive intermediate, General Motors revived the Malibu nameplate as a front-wheel-drive car in 1997.
From the Wikipedia article "Chevrolet Malibu", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2025 Malibu pros & cons
Full 2025 details →What's good
- 5-star NHTSA safety ratingTop overall score in federal crash tests.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2024 Malibu
44 owner complaints · 2 recalls · 3 crash reports
NHTSA overall: ★★★★★
Year to avoid2016 Malibu
865 owner complaints · 10 recalls · 2 fire reports · 24 crash reports
Most reported: Engine
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 10 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
Malibu changes by model year
- 2023
- Engine dropped: 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG down from 32 to 30
- NHTSA overall rating up from 4 to 5 stars
- 2020
- No hybrid version any more
- Engine dropped: 1.8L 4-cyl
- Best combined MPG down from 46 to 32
- 2019
- NHTSA overall rating down from 5 to 4 stars
- 2017
- Engine dropped: 2.5L 4-cyl
- Now crash-tested by NHTSA: 5 stars overall
- 2016
- New body dimensions: 2.0 in longer, wheelbase +3.5 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New hybrid version
- Engines added: 1.8L 4-cyl and 1.5L 4-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG up from 29 to 46
- 2015
- No hybrid version any more
- Engine dropped: 2.4L 4-cyl
- 2014
- Lightest version 179 lb heavier
- 2013
- New body dimensions, wheelbase −4.3 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New hybrid version
- Engines added: 2.5L 4-cyl and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Engine dropped: 3.6L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 26 to 29
- 2011
- No hybrid version any more
- Engine dropped: 3.5L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG down from 29 to 26
- 2009
- Best combined MPG up from 27 to 29
- 2008
- New body dimensions: 3.5 in longer, wheelbase +5.9 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New hybrid version
- Engines added: 2.4L 4-cyl and 3.6L 6-cyl
- Engines dropped: 2.2L 4-cyl and 3.9L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 25 to 27
- 2006
- Engine added: 3.9L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 21 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 31 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 12 |
| 2024 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 31 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 44 |
| 2023 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 30 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 72 |
| 2022 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 32 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 99 |
| 2021 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 32 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 90 |
| 2020 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 32 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,126 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 199 |
| 2019 | 1.8L 4-cyl, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 46 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,087 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 195 |
| 2018 | 1.8L 4-cyl, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 46 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,087 lb | ★★★★★ | 6 | 711 |
| 2017 | 1.8L 4-cyl, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 46 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,087 lb | ★★★★★ | 4 | 726 |
| 2016 | 1.8L 4-cyl, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl | 46 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,087 lb | Not rated | 10 | 865 |
| 2015 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 29 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,583 lb | Not rated | 3 | 267 |
| 2014 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 29 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,572 lb | Not rated | 6 | 330 |
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 29 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,393 lb | Not rated | 11 | 811 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,419 lb | Not rated | 2 | 798 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,415 lb | Not rated | 3 | 793 |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 29 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,415 lb | Not rated | 3 | 974 |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 29 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,455 lb | Not rated | 3 | 1,140 |
| 2008 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 27 MPG | 191.7 in | 3,459 lb | Not rated | 4 | 486 |
| 2007 | 2.2L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.9L 6-cyl | 25 MPG | 188.2 in | 3,122 lb | Not rated | 3 | 528 |
| 2006 | 2.2L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.9L 6-cyl | 24 MPG | 188.2 in | 3,175 lb | Not rated | 4 | 509 |
| 2005 | 2.2L 4-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl | 25 MPG | 188.2 in | 3,175 lb | Not rated | 4 | 414 |
Alternatives to the 2025 Malibu
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Honda Civic | 49 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2025 Honda Accord | 48 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2025 Toyota Crown | 41 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2025 Toyota Camry | 51 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2025 Hyundai Elantra | 54 MPG | ★★★★★ | 2 |
| 2025 Subaru WRX | 22 MPG | ★★★★★ | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chevrolet. How we calculate this →



