Chevrolet Equinox
23 model years from 2005 to 2027, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2027
- Class
- Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Latest engines
- 1.5L 4-cyl turbo
- Best MPG
- 19–32 combined, by year
- EV range
- up to 319 mi
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2023)
- Recalls
- 33 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2013 (702)
- Fewest problems
- 2023
- Interest
- 13,247 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2026 Equinox in brief
The 2026 Chevrolet Equinox is a small SUV offered with a 1.5L 4-cyl turbo engine and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
It measures about 183 inches long and 75 inches wide on a 108-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,583 lb (4dr SUV AWD).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 27 MPG combined (26 city / 29 highway), 11% worse than the 2026 small SUV average of 30.2 MPG, for an estimated $700 a year in fuel.
The electric version has an EPA-rated range of up to 319 miles and takes about 5.9 hours to charge on a 240-volt Level 2 charger.
It has 3 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 88 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the service brakes.
The Chevrolet Equinox has 23 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2027, classed as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD.
Its most efficient year was 2019 at 32 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 19 to 32 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the engine (2,628), visibility/wiper (1,168), power train (819).
Buying used? 2023 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2015 is the year to avoid.
2025 has the most recalls (6); all years together count 33 campaigns and 7,234 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Equinox compares
The 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is a SUV - offered with a 3.4L 6-cyl engine and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 189 inches long and 71 inches wide on a 113-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,660 lb.
About the Chevrolet Equinox
The Chevrolet Equinox is a crossover SUV introduced by Chevrolet in 2004 for the 2005 model year. It was intended to replace the North American Chevrolet Tracker and Chevrolet S-10 Blazer. The third-generation Equinox also replaced the first-generation Chevrolet Captiva.
From the Wikipedia article "Chevrolet Equinox", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2026 Equinox pros & cons
Full 2026 details →What's good
- Long EV rangeUp to 319 miles on a charge (EPA).
- Electric version availableOffered as a electric as well as gas.
- AWD / 4WD available
- Lots of standard safety tech4 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2023 Equinox
99 owner complaints · 3 recalls · 5 crash reports
NHTSA overall: ★★★★★
Year to avoid2015 Equinox
680 owner complaints · 2 recalls · 6 fire reports · 24 crash reports
Most reported: Visibility/Wiper
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 10 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
Equinox changes by model year
- 2026
- New body dimensions: 7.5 in shorter, wheelbase −8.2 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- 2025
- New body dimensions: 7.5 in longer, wheelbase +8.2 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- 2024
- New all-electric version
- 2021
- Engine dropped: 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- 2020
- No diesel version any more
- Engine dropped: 1.6L 4-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG down from 32 to 28
- 2018
- New body dimensions: 5.1 in shorter, wheelbase −5.1 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New diesel version
- Engines added: 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Engines dropped: 2.4L 4-cyl and 3.6L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 25 to 32
- NHTSA overall rating up from 4 to 5 stars
- 2017
- Now crash-tested by NHTSA: 4 stars overall
- 2013
- Engine added: 3.6L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
- 2010
- Engines added: 2.4L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl
- Engines dropped: 3.4L 6-cyl and 3.6L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 20 to 26
- 2008
- Engine added: 3.6L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 23 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 27 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 27 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,583 lb | Not rated | 3 | 88 |
| 2025 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 27 MPG | 190.6 in | 4,802 lb | Not rated | 6 | 405 |
| 2024 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,466 lb | Not rated | 2 | 190 |
| 2023 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,466 lb | ★★★★★ | 3 | 99 |
| 2022 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,466 lb | ★★★★★ | 6 | 186 |
| 2021 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,466 lb | ★★★★★ | 4 | 100 |
| 2020 | 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,466 lb | ★★★★★ | 4 | 318 |
| 2019 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 32 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,512 lb | ★★★★★ | 4 | 308 |
| 2018 | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo, 1.5L 4-cyl turbo, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 32 MPG | 183.1 in | 3,483 lb | ★★★★★ | 5 | 410 |
| 2017 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 25 MPG | 188.2 in | 3,929 lb | ★★★★★ | 0 | 276 |
| 2016 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.2 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 1 | 399 |
| 2015 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 2 | 680 |
| 2014 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 1 | 531 |
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 2 | 702 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 3 | 619 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,929 lb | Not rated | 3 | 612 |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,777 lb | Not rated | 2 | 558 |
| 2009 | 3.4L 6-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 20 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,777 lb | Not rated | 0 | 53 |
| 2008 | 3.6L 6-cyl, 3.4L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,777 lb | Not rated | 0 | 195 |
| 2007 | 3.4L 6-cyl | 20 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,777 lb | Not rated | 1 | 215 |
| 2006 | 3.4L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,777 lb | Not rated | 0 | 159 |
| 2005 | 3.4L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 188.6 in | 3,660 lb | Not rated | 0 | 130 |
Alternatives to the 2026 Equinox
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Toyota RAV4 | 43 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Honda CR-V | 40 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Hyundai Tucson | 38 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2026 Subaru Forester | 35 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2026 Mazda CX-5 | 26 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2026 Toyota Corolla Cross | 42 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chevrolet. How we calculate this →



