Suzuki Grand Vitara
9 model years from 2005 to 2013, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2013
- Class
- Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Latest engines
- 2.4L 4-cyl
- Best MPG
- 18–22 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 7 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2006 (27)
The 2013 Grand Vitara in brief
The 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara is a small SUV offered with a 2.4L 4-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 169 inches long and 71 inches wide on a 104-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,651 lb.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 22 MPG combined (19 city / 25 highway), 4% worse than the 2013 small SUV average of 23 MPG, for an estimated $3,050 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 2 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 4 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the power train.
The Suzuki Grand Vitara has 9 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2013, classed as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD.
Its most efficient year was 2013 at 22 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 18 to 22 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the air bags (35), exterior lighting (24), electrical system (20).
2010 has the most recalls (5); all years together count 7 campaigns and 96 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Grand Vitara compares
The 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.5L 6-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 161 inches long and 70 inches wide on a 98-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,230 lb.
2013 Grand Vitara pros & cons
Full 2013 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints4 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 105 for similar models.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Grand Vitara changes by model year
- 2011
- Engine dropped: 3.2L 6-cyl
- 2009
- Engines added: 2.4L 4-cyl and 3.2L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 2.7L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 19 to 22
- 2006
- New body dimensions: 7.5 in longer, wheelbase +6.3 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine dropped: 2.5L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 9 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,651 lb | Not rated | 2 | 4 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,651 lb | Not rated | 2 | 11 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,651 lb | Not rated | 4 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.2L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,607 lb | Not rated | 5 | 14 |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.2L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,607 lb | Not rated | 4 | 9 |
| 2008 | 2.7L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,638 lb | Not rated | 2 | 16 |
| 2007 | 2.7L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,638 lb | Not rated | 2 | 13 |
| 2006 | 2.7L 6-cyl | 19 MPG | 168.9 in | 3,638 lb | Not rated | 4 | 27 |
| 2005 | 2.5L 6-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 18 MPG | 161.4 in | 3,230 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Alternatives to the 2013 Grand Vitara
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Honda CR-V | 26 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2013 Hyundai Tucson | 25 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2013 Volkswagen Tiguan | 23 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2013 Kia Sportage | 25 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2013 Ford Escape | 26 MPG | Not rated | 18 |
| 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 18 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Suzuki. How we calculate this →