Saab 9-7
5 model years from 2005 to 2009, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2009
- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
- Latest engines
- 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl
- Best MPG
- 16–16 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 4 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2007 (21)
The 2009 9-7 in brief
The 2009 Saab 9-7 is a SUV - offered with 3 engines (4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl and 6.0L 8-cyl) and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 193 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 113-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,720 lb.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (14 city / 20 highway), 10% worse than the 2009 SUV - average of 17.7 MPG, for an estimated $4,200 a year in fuel.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 14 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the exterior lighting.
The Saab 9-7 has 5 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2009.
Its most efficient year was 2009 at 16 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 16 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the exterior lighting (41), electrical system (23), electronic stability control (esc) (6).
2007 has the most recalls (4); all years together count 4 campaigns and 77 owner complaints.
How the 2005 9-7 compares
The 2005 Saab 9-7 is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (4.2L 6-cyl and 5.3L 8-cyl) and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 194 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 113-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,612 lb.
2009 9-7 pros & cons
Full 2009 details →What's good
- Few owner complaints14 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 47 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
9-7 changes by model year
- 2008
- Engine added: 6.0L 8-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 5 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,720 lb | Not rated | 0 | 14 |
| 2008 | 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,720 lb | Not rated | 1 | 14 |
| 2007 | 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,720 lb | Not rated | 4 | 21 |
| 2006 | 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,720 lb | Not rated | 4 | 18 |
| 2005 | 4.2L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,612 lb | Not rated | 2 | 10 |
Alternatives to the 2009 9-7
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Toyota Land Cruiser | 15 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2009 Toyota 4Runner | 18 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2009 Toyota Highlander | 26 MPG | Not rated | 9 |
| 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 18 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 21 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2009 GMC Yukon | 21 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Saab. How we calculate this →