Saab 9-3
8 model years from 2005 to 2012, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2012
- Class
- Compact Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Best MPG
- 22–24 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 3 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2008 (134)
The 2012 9-3 in brief
The 2012 Saab 9-3 is a compact car offered with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbo engine and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 24 MPG combined (20 city / 32 highway), 6% worse than the 2012 compact car average of 25.6 MPG, for an estimated $2,800 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Saab 9-3 has 8 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2012.
Its most efficient year was 2012 at 24 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 24 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the air bags (288), engine (65), seat belts (40).
2011 has the most recalls (3); all years together count 3 campaigns and 452 owner complaints.
How the 2005 9-3 compares
The 2005 Saab 9-3 is a compact car offered with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbo engine and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 183 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 106-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,479 lb (2dr Convertible FWD Arc/Aero).
2012 9-3 pros & cons
Full 2012 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 53 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
9-3 changes by model year
- 2011
- Lightest version 220 lb heavier
- 2010
- Engine dropped: 2.8L 6-cyl turbo
- 2008
- All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
- 2006
- Engine added: 2.8L 6-cyl turbo
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 8 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 24 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 24 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,748 lb | Not rated | 3 | 29 |
| 2010 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 24 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 3 | 26 |
| 2009 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.8L 6-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 2 | 34 |
| 2008 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.8L 6-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 2 | 134 |
| 2007 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.8L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 2 | 93 |
| 2006 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.8L 6-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 2 | 106 |
| 2005 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 182.7 in | 3,479 lb | Not rated | 1 | 30 |
Alternatives to the 2012 9-3
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Toyota Corolla | 29 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2012 Honda Civic | 44 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2012 Mazda 3 | 32 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2012 Volkswagen Golf/GTI | 32 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2012 Subaru Impreza/Outback Sport | 30 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2012 Toyota Yaris | 33 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Saab. How we calculate this →