Makes›Porsche›Cayman›2018

2018 Porsche Cayman

Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2018 models.

Porsche Cayman
Pictured: 2018 Porsche 718 Cayman S S-A 2.5 Front. Photo: Vauxford, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Class
Two Seaters
Engines
2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo
Drivetrain
Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel
Premium Gasoline
MPG (best)
25 combined · 22 city / 29 hwy
Length
–
Curb weight
–
NHTSA rating
Not rated
Recalls
0 campaigns

Pros & cons

What's good

  • Excellent fuel economyUp to 25 MPG combined — 28% better than the average 2018 two seaters (19.6 MPG).
  • No recalls so far

Watch out for

  • Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.

Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 5 similar 2018 models — not a review. How we calculate this →

Overview

The 2018 Porsche Cayman is a two seaters offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl turbo and 2.5L 4-cyl turbo) and rear-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 25 MPG combined (22 city / 29 highway), 28% better than the 2018 two seaters average of 19.6 MPG, for an estimated $3,300 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.

What changed for 2018

No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2017 Cayman — a carry-over year in the data.

Compared with 2017; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2017 Cayman →

Engines, MPG & running costs

VersionEngineTransmissionDriveCity / Hwy / Combvs. classFuel / yrCO₂ g/mi
Cayman2.0L 4-cyl turboAutomatic (AM-S7)Rear-Wheel Drive22 / 29 / 25+28%$3,300353
Cayman2.0L 4-cyl turboManual 6-spdRear-Wheel Drive21 / 28 / 24+22%$3,400369
Cayman S2.5L 4-cyl turboAutomatic (AM-S7)Rear-Wheel Drive21 / 28 / 24+22%$3,400372
Cayman S2.5L 4-cyl turboManual 6-spdRear-Wheel Drive20 / 26 / 22+12%$3,750401
Cayman GTS2.5L 4-cyl turboAutomatic (AM-S7)Rear-Wheel Drive20 / 26 / 22+12%$3,750400
Cayman GTS2.5L 4-cyl turboManual 6-spdRear-Wheel Drive19 / 25 / 21+7%$3,900413
5/10EPA fuel economy score (best version)
5/10EPA greenhouse gas score
Spend $4,500Fuel over 5 years vs. average new car
19.6 MPG2018 Two Seaters average

EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2018 EPA class average. How we calculate this →

Safety ratings & technology

NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2018 Porsche Cayman.

Similar 2018 two seaterss

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2018 Porsche Cayman (this car)25 MPGNot rated0
2018 Acura NSX21 MPGNot rated3
2018 Porsche Boxster25 MPGNot rated0
2018 Alfa Romeo 4C28 MPGNot rated0
2018 Audi TT Roadster26 MPGNot rated1
2018 Mercedes-Benz SLC-Class27 MPGNot rated0

Recalls (0)

No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2018 Porsche Cayman.

Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗

Not every 2018 Porsche Cayman is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.

Owner-reported problems

No owner complaints for the 2018 Porsche Cayman in NHTSA's database since 2015.

Used 2018 Porsche Cayman buyer's checklist

  1. Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
  2. Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.

Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2018 Porsche Cayman. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.

Other Cayman years

Compare all years →
YearMPG (best)LengthOverallRecallsComplaints
2020 Cayman24–Not rated00
2019 Cayman25–Not rated00
2017 Cayman25–Not rated00
2016 Cayman25172.4 inNot rated00
2015 Cayman25172.4 inNot rated24
2014 Cayman25172.4 inNot rated55
2012 Cayman23171.3 inNot rated12
2011 Cayman23171.3 inNot rated04
2010 Cayman24171.3 inNot rated05
2009 Cayman24171.3 inNot rated01
2008 Cayman23171.3 inNot rated00
2007 Cayman23171.3 inNot rated02

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Porsche. How we calculate this →