2017 Nissan Armada
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2017 models.

- Class
- Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
- Body styles
- 4dr SUV
- Engines
- 5.6L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Regular Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 16 combined · 14 city / 19 hwy
- Length
- 209.1 in
- Curb weight
- 5,917 lb
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 16 MPG combined, 16% below the 2017 standard SUV average of 19.1 MPG.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 9 similar 2017 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2017 Nissan Armada is a standard SUV offered with a 5.6L 8-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 209 inches long and 80 inches wide on a 121-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 5,917 lb.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (14 city / 19 highway), 16% worse than the 2017 standard SUV average of 19.1 MPG, for an estimated $4,200 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 81 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the electrical system.
What changed for 2017
- New body dimensions: 2.4 in longer, wheelbase −1.9 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
Compared with 2015; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2015 Armada →
Dimensions & weight
| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Track F / R | Curb weight | Weight F/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4dr SUV | 209.1 in | 79.9 in | 76 in | 121.3 in | 67.7 / 68.1 in | 5,917 lb | 52/48 |
Transport Canada CVS (Open Government Licence – Canada), Canadian-market figures.
Will it fit your garage? Check with your measurements →Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armada 2WD | 5.6L 8-cyl | Automatic (S7) | Rear-Wheel Drive | 14 / 19 / 16 | -16% | $4,200 | 555 |
| Armada 4WD | 5.6L 8-cyl | Automatic (S7) | 4-Wheel Drive | 13 / 18 / 15 | -19% | $4,450 | 588 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2017 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2017 Nissan Armada.
Similar 2017 standard SUVs
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Nissan Armada (this car) | 16 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser | 15 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2017 GMC Yukon | 19 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
| 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe | 19 MPG | ★★★★★ | 4 |
| 2017 Ford Expedition | 18 MPG | ★★★★★ | 4 |
| 2017 Dodge Durango | 21 MPG | ★★★★★ | 2 |
| 2017 Toyota Sequoia | 15 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2017 Nissan Armada.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2017 Nissan Armada is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
Unverified owner reports; best-sellers collect more.
Used 2017 Nissan Armada buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Electrical System — 32 owner reports. Test every window, lock, light, screen and USB port; check the battery age.
- Power Train — 16 owner reports. Test-drive through all gears, including reverse; note slipping, harsh or delayed shifts.
- Engine — 16 owner reports. Cold-start the engine, listen for knocking, and watch for warning lights or hesitation on acceleration.
- Mileage to watch. Owners typically reported problems around 44,000 miles; ask what was repaired near that point.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2017 Nissan Armada. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other Armada years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Armada | 18 | 209.8 in | Not rated | 2 | 9 |
| 2025 Armada | 18 | 209.8 in | Not rated | 2 | 21 |
| 2024 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | ★★★★★ | 1 | 4 |
| 2023 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | ★★★★★ | 1 | 5 |
| 2022 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | Not rated | 1 | 9 |
| 2021 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | Not rated | 2 | 13 |
| 2020 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | ★★★★★ | 2 | 27 |
| 2019 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | ★★★★★ | 1 | 79 |
| 2018 Armada | 16 | 209.1 in | ★★★★★ | 1 | 76 |
| 2015 Armada | 15 | 206.7 in | Not rated | 3 | 21 |
| 2014 Armada | 15 | 206.7 in | Not rated | 1 | 13 |
| 2013 Armada | 15 | 206.7 in | Not rated | 2 | 11 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Nissan. How we calculate this →