Mercury Mountaineer
6 model years from 2005 to 2010, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2010
- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Latest engines
- 4.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 16–17 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 1 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2008 (39)
The 2010 Mountaineer in brief
The 2010 Mercury Mountaineer is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (4.6L 8-cyl and 4.0L 6-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 17 MPG combined (15 city / 21 highway), 18% worse than the 2010 SUV - average of 20.7 MPG, for an estimated $3,950 a year in fuel.
It has 1 recall campaign on file and owners have filed 7 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the service brakes.
The Mercury Mountaineer has 6 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2010.
Its most efficient year was 2010 at 17 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 17 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the seats (32), electrical system (32), power train (23).
2010 has the most recalls (1); all years together count 1 campaigns and 129 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Mountaineer compares
The 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (4.0L 6-cyl and 4.6L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive, 2-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (14 city / 19 highway), 11% worse than the 2005 SUV - average of 18 MPG, for an estimated $4,200 a year in fuel.
2010 Mountaineer pros & cons
Full 2010 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints7 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 78 for similar models.
Watch out for
- Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 17 MPG combined, 18% below the 2010 SUV - average of 20.7 MPG.
Show all 6 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 4.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl | 17 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 1 | 7 |
| 2009 | 4.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl | 17 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 4.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 39 |
| 2007 | 4.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl | 16 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 32 |
| 2006 | 4.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 25 |
| 2005 | 4.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 23 |
Alternatives to the 2010 Mountaineer
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser | 15 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 14 |
| 2010 Toyota 4Runner | 20 MPG | Not rated | 12 |
| 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | 17 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2010 Toyota Highlander | 26 MPG | Not rated | 11 |
| 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 18 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercury. How we calculate this →