Makes›Mercury›Mountaineer

Mercury Mountaineer

6 model years from 2005 to 2010, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

Model years
2005–2010
Class
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
Latest engines
4.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl
Best MPG
16–17 combined, by year
Latest rating
Not rated
Recalls
1 campaigns, all years
Most complaints
2008 (39)

The 2010 Mountaineer in brief

The 2010 Mercury Mountaineer is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (4.6L 8-cyl and 4.0L 6-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 17 MPG combined (15 city / 21 highway), 18% worse than the 2010 SUV - average of 20.7 MPG, for an estimated $3,950 a year in fuel.

It has 1 recall campaign on file and owners have filed 7 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the service brakes.

The Mercury Mountaineer has 6 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2010.

Its most efficient year was 2010 at 17 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 17 MPG.

Owners most often report problems with the seats (32), electrical system (32), power train (23).

2010 has the most recalls (1); all years together count 1 campaigns and 129 owner complaints.

How the 2005 Mountaineer compares

The 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (4.0L 6-cyl and 4.6L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive, 2-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (14 city / 19 highway), 11% worse than the 2005 SUV - average of 18 MPG, for an estimated $4,200 a year in fuel.

2010 Mountaineer pros & cons

Full 2010 details →

What's good

  • AWD / 4WD available
  • Few owner complaints7 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 78 for similar models.

Watch out for

  • Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 17 MPG combined, 18% below the 2010 SUV - average of 20.7 MPG.
Show all 6 model years side by side
YearLatest enginesBest MPG / rangeLengthWeightOverallRecallsComplaints
20104.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl17 MPG––Not rated17
20094.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl17 MPG––Not rated03
20084.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl16 MPG––Not rated039
20074.6L 8-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl16 MPG––Not rated032
20064.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl16 MPG––Not rated025
20054.0L 6-cyl, 4.6L 8-cyl16 MPG––Not rated023
Best combined MPG by model year — Mercury Mountaineer
2005: 16 MPG2006: 16 MPG2007: 16 MPG2008: 16 MPG2009: 17 MPG2010: 17 MPG200520062007200820092010max 17 MPG

Alternatives to the 2010 Mountaineer

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2010 Toyota Land Cruiser15 MPGNot rated6
2010 Toyota RAV424 MPGNot rated14
2010 Toyota 4Runner20 MPGNot rated12
2010 Chevrolet Suburban17 MPGNot rated3
2010 Toyota Highlander26 MPGNot rated11
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee18 MPGNot rated4

Most common owner-reported problems

Seats32
Electrical System32
Power Train23
Unknown Or Other21
Engine17
Structure › Body12
Service Brakes6
Vehicle Speed Control5
Owner complaints by model year — Mercury Mountaineer
2005: 232006: 252007: 322008: 392009: 32010: 7200520062007200820092010max 39
Check your VIN for open recalls ↗

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercury. How we calculate this →