Mercedes-Benz R-Class
8 model years from 2006 to 2013, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2006–2013
- Class
- Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
- Latest engines
- 3.5L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 16–21 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns, all years
The 2013 R-Class in brief
The 2013 Mercedes-Benz R-Class is a standard SUV offered with a 3.5L 6-cyl engine and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 203 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 127-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 5,005 lb (R350 4matic 4 Dr SUV).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 18 MPG combined (16 city / 21 highway), 5% better than the 2013 standard SUV average of 17.1 MPG, for an estimated $4,550 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Mercedes-Benz R-Class has 8 model years in our data, from 2006 to 2013, classed as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD.
Its most efficient year was 2008 at 21 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 21 MPG.
How the 2006 R-Class compares
The 2006 Mercedes-Benz R-Class is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (3.5L 6-cyl and 5.0L 8-cyl) and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (15 city / 20 highway), 6% worse than the 2006 SUV - average of 17 MPG, for an estimated $5,150 a year in fuel.
2013 R-Class pros & cons
Full 2013 details →What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
R-Class changes by model year
- 2012
- All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
- Best combined MPG up from 16 to 18
- Lightest version 232 lb lighter
- 2011
- All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered
- 2009
- No diesel version any more
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG down from 21 to 16
- 2008
- Engines dropped: 5.0L 8-cyl and 6.2L 8-cyl
- 2007
- New diesel version
- Engines added: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo and 6.2L 8-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 16 to 21
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 8 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 3.5L 6-cyl | 18 MPG | 203.1 in | 5,005 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3.5L 6-cyl | 18 MPG | 203.1 in | 4,916 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3.5L 6-cyl | 16 MPG | 203.1 in | 5,798 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3.5L 6-cyl | 16 MPG | 203.5 in | 5,038 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 3.5L 6-cyl | 16 MPG | 203.1 in | 5,192 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | 203.1 in | 5,192 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl | 16 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Alternatives to the 2013 R-Class
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Cadillac Escalade | 21 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2013 Audi Q7 | 22 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2013 Lexus LX | 14 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2013 Lincoln Navigator | 16 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class | 16 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Lincoln MKT | 23 MPG | Not rated | 8 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →