Makes›Mercedes-Benz›R-Class

Mercedes-Benz R-Class

8 model years from 2006 to 2013, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

Model years
2006–2013
Class
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
Latest engines
3.5L 6-cyl
Best MPG
16–21 combined, by year
Latest rating
Not rated
Recalls
0 campaigns, all years

The 2013 R-Class in brief

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz R-Class is a standard SUV offered with a 3.5L 6-cyl engine and 4-wheel drive.

It measures about 203 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 127-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 5,005 lb (R350 4matic 4 Dr SUV).

EPA rates its most efficient version at 18 MPG combined (16 city / 21 highway), 5% better than the 2013 standard SUV average of 17.1 MPG, for an estimated $4,550 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.

The Mercedes-Benz R-Class has 8 model years in our data, from 2006 to 2013, classed as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD.

Its most efficient year was 2008 at 21 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 21 MPG.

How the 2006 R-Class compares

The 2006 Mercedes-Benz R-Class is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (3.5L 6-cyl and 5.0L 8-cyl) and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.

EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (15 city / 20 highway), 6% worse than the 2006 SUV - average of 17 MPG, for an estimated $5,150 a year in fuel.

2013 R-Class pros & cons

Full 2013 details →

What's good

  • No recalls so far

Watch out for

  • Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.

R-Class changes by model year

  1. 2012
    • All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
    • Best combined MPG up from 16 to 18
    • Lightest version 232 lb lighter
  2. 2011
    • All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered
  3. 2009
    • No diesel version any more
    • Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo
    • Best combined MPG down from 21 to 16
  4. 2008
    • Engines dropped: 5.0L 8-cyl and 6.2L 8-cyl
  5. 2007
    • New diesel version
    • Engines added: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo and 6.2L 8-cyl
    • Best combined MPG up from 16 to 21

Years without a measurable change are left out.

Show all 8 model years side by side
YearLatest enginesBest MPG / rangeLengthWeightOverallRecallsComplaints
20133.5L 6-cyl18 MPG203.1 in5,005 lbNot rated00
20123.5L 6-cyl18 MPG203.1 in4,916 lbNot rated00
20113.5L 6-cyl16 MPG203.1 in5,798 lbNot rated00
20103.5L 6-cyl16 MPG203.5 in5,038 lbNot rated00
20093.5L 6-cyl16 MPG203.1 in5,192 lbNot rated00
20083.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl21 MPG203.1 in5,192 lbNot rated00
20073.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl21 MPG––Not rated00
20063.5L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl16 MPG––Not rated00
Best combined MPG by model year — Mercedes-Benz R-Class
2006: 16 MPG2007: 21 MPG2008: 21 MPG2009: 16 MPG2010: 16 MPG2011: 16 MPG2012: 18 MPG2013: 18 MPG20062007200820092010201120122013max 21 MPG

Alternatives to the 2013 R-Class

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2013 Cadillac Escalade21 MPGNot rated4
2013 Audi Q722 MPGNot rated3
2013 Lexus LX14 MPGNot rated2
2013 Lincoln Navigator16 MPGNot rated0
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class16 MPGNot rated0
2013 Lincoln MKT23 MPGNot rated8
Check your VIN for open recalls ↗

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →