Mazda CX-50
4 model years from 2023 to 2026, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2023–2026
- Class
- Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
- Latest engines
- 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo
- Best MPG
- 27–38 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2025)
- Recalls
- 7 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2023 (64)
- Interest
- 7,645 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2026 CX-50 in brief
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is a small SUV offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 2.5L 4-cyl turbo), including a hybrid version and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 186 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 111-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,812 lb (Cx50 4dr SUV).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 38 MPG combined (39 city / 37 highway), 47% better than the 2026 small SUV average of 25.9 MPG, for an estimated $1,750 a year in fuel.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 14 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the forward collision avoidance.
The Mazda CX-50 has 4 model years in our data, from 2023 to 2026.
Its most efficient year was 2026 at 38 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 27 to 38 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the service brakes (29), power train (25), unknown or other (19).
Buying used? 2024 has the fewest problems in our data.
2025 has the most recalls (5); all years together count 7 campaigns and 161 owner complaints.
How the 2023 CX-50 compares
The 2023 Mazda CX-50 is a small SUV offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 2.5L 4-cyl turbo) and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 186 inches long and 76 inches wide on a 111-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,693 lb (Cx50 4dr SUV).
About the Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 is a compact crossover SUV produced by the Japanese automobile manufacturer Mazda since 2022 for the 2023 model year, for the North American and Chinese markets. Based on the same transverse, front-wheel-drive platform as the fourth-generation Mazda3 and the CX-30, the vehicle is sold alongside the slightly smaller CX-5 and is positioned below the larger, rear-wheel-drive based CX-70.
From the Wikipedia article "Mazda CX-50", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2026 CX-50 pros & cons
Full 2026 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 38 MPG combined — 47% better than the average 2026 small SUV (25.9 MPG).
- Hybrid version availableOffered as a hybrid as well as gas.
- Lots of standard safety tech5 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2024 CX-50
35 owner complaints · 1 recall · 1 fire report · 3 crash reports
NHTSA overall: ★★★★★
None of the 2 model years we compared stands out for complaints or recalls.
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 2 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
CX-50 changes by model year
- 2025
- New hybrid version
- Best combined MPG up from 27 to 38
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 4 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo | 38 MPG | 185.8 in | 3,812 lb | Not rated | 0 | 14 |
| 2025 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo | 38 MPG | 185.8 in | 3,812 lb | ★★★★★ | 5 | 48 |
| 2024 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo | 27 MPG | 185.8 in | 3,693 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 35 |
| 2023 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo | 27 MPG | 185.8 in | 3,693 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 64 |
Alternatives to the 2026 CX-50
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Toyota RAV4 | 43 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Honda CR-V | 40 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Toyota 4Runner | 23 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Hyundai Tucson | 38 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2026 Subaru Forester | 35 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2026 Mazda CX-5 | 26 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →



