Kia Rondo
6 model years from 2007 to 2012, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2007–2012
- Class
- Midsize Station Wagons
- Latest engines
- 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 22–22 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 3 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2009 (52)
The 2012 Rondo in brief
The 2012 Kia Rondo is a midsize station wagon offered with 2 engines (2.4L 4-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 179 inches long and 72 inches wide on a 106-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,717 lb (4dr Wagon FWD EX-V6/EX-V6 Luxury).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 22 MPG combined (20 city / 26 highway), 11% worse than the 2012 midsize station wagon average of 24.8 MPG, for an estimated $3,050 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Kia Rondo has 6 model years in our data, from 2007 to 2012.
Its most efficient year was 2012 at 22 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 22 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the steering (31), air bags (28), engine (27).
2010 has the most recalls (2); all years together count 3 campaigns and 148 owner complaints.
How the 2007 Rondo compares
The 2007 Kia Rondo is a midsize station wagon offered with 2 engines (2.4L 4-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 179 inches long and 72 inches wide on a 106-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,450 lb (4dr Wagon FWD EX-V6/EX-V6 Luxury).
2012 Rondo pros & cons
Full 2012 details →What's good
- Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 40 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Show all 6 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,717 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,717 lb | Not rated | 1 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,717 lb | Not rated | 2 | 7 |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,450 lb | Not rated | 1 | 52 |
| 2008 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,450 lb | Not rated | 2 | 40 |
| 2007 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 179.1 in | 3,450 lb | Not rated | 2 | 47 |
Alternatives to the 2012 Rondo
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Toyota Prius v | 41 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2012 Dodge Caliber | 27 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix | 29 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Kia. How we calculate this →