Mitsubishi Eclipse
8 model years from 2005 to 2012, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2012
- Class
- Minicompact Cars, Subcompact Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 23–23 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 2 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2007 (96)
The 2012 Eclipse in brief
The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is a minicompact car offered with 2 engines (2.4L 4-cyl and 3.8L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 180 inches long and 72 inches wide on a 102-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,274 lb (Gs 2dr Coupe).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 23 MPG combined (20 city / 28 highway), 4% better than the 2012 minicompact car average of 22.2 MPG, for an estimated $2,900 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 7 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the air bags.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse has 8 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2012, classed as Minicompact Cars, Subcompact Cars.
Its most efficient year was 2012 at 23 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 23 to 23 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the service brakes (201), air bags (27), service brakes, hydraulic (21).
2009 has the most recalls (1); all years together count 2 campaigns and 273 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Eclipse compares
The 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse is a minicompact car offered with 2 engines (2.4L 4-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 177 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 101-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,142 lb (Coupe 2dr Coupe GT/GT Premium).
2012 Eclipse pros & cons
Full 2012 details →What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Eclipse changes by model year
- 2008
- Lightest version 198 lb lighter
- 2007
- Lightest version 198 lb heavier
- 2006
- New body dimensions: 3.1 in longer — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine added: 3.8L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 8 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 0 | 7 |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 1 | 43 |
| 2008 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 1 | 71 |
| 2007 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,472 lb | Not rated | 1 | 96 |
| 2006 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.8L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,274 lb | Not rated | 1 | 52 |
| 2005 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 176.8 in | 3,142 lb | Not rated | 1 | 3 |
Alternatives to the 2006 Eclipse
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Toyota Corolla | 31 MPG | Not rated | 8 |
| 2006 Honda Civic | 42 MPG | Not rated | 7 |
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 20 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2006 Honda Accord | 26 MPG | Not rated | 9 |
| 2006 Toyota Camry | 25 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2006 Toyota Prius | 46 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mitsubishi. How we calculate this →