DecodedCars2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2010 models.
- Class
- Two Seaters
- Engines
- 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Premium Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 21 combined · 19 city / 26 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 4 similar 2010 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is a two seaters offered with 3 engines (3.5L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl and 5.5L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 21 MPG combined (19 city / 26 highway), 11% better than the 2010 two seaters average of 19 MPG, for an estimated $3,900 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2010
- Engine added: 5.5L 8-cyl
- Engine dropped: 5.4L 8-cyl
Compared with 2009; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2009 SLK-Class →
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLK300 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 19 / 26 / 21 | +11% | $3,900 | 423 |
| SLK300 | 3.0L 6-cyl | Manual 6-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 18 / 26 / 21 | +11% | $3,900 | 423 |
| SLK350 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Manual 6-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 17 / 25 / 20 | +5% | $4,100 | 444 |
| SLK350 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 18 / 25 / 20 | +5% | $4,100 | 444 |
| SLK55 AMG | 5.5L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 14 / 22 / 17 | -11% | $4,850 | 523 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2010 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2010 two seaterss
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class (this car) | 21 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2010 Audi R8 | 16 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2010 Porsche Cayman | 24 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2010 Porsche Boxster | 24 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2010 BMW Z4 | 22 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other SLK-Class years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 SLK-Class | 27 | 162.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 SLK-Class | 26 | 162.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 SLK-Class | 26 | 162.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 SLK-Class | 26 | 162.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 SLK-Class | 26 | 162.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 SLK-Class | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 SLK-Class | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 SLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 SLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 SLK-Class | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 SLK-Class | 19 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →