DecodedCars2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2005 models.
- Class
- Subcompact Cars
- Engines
- 3.2L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Premium Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 21 combined · 18 city / 26 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 3 similar 2005 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class is a subcompact car offered with 3 engines (3.2L 6-cyl, 5.0L 8-cyl and 5.4L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 21 MPG combined (18 city / 26 highway), 0% better than the 2005 subcompact car average of 20.9 MPG, for an estimated $3,900 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLK320 | 3.2L 6-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 18 / 26 / 21 | 0% | $3,900 | 423 |
| CLK320 (Cabriolet) | 3.2L 6-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 18 / 24 / 20 | -4% | $4,100 | 444 |
| CLK500 | 5.0L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 15 / 23 / 18 | -14% | $4,550 | 494 |
| CLK500 (Cabriolet) | 5.0L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 15 / 23 / 18 | -14% | $4,550 | 494 |
| CLK55 AMG | 5.4L 8-cyl | Automatic (S5) | Rear-Wheel Drive | 14 / 21 / 17 | -19% | $4,850 | 523 |
| CLK55 AMG (Cabriolet) | 5.4L 8-cyl | Automatic (S5) | Rear-Wheel Drive | 14 / 21 / 16 | -23% | $5,150 | 555 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2005 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2005 subcompact cars
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class (this car) | 21 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2005 BMW 6 Series | 19 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2005 Audi S4 | 16 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2005 Maserati Coupe and Gransport | 12 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other CLK-Class years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 CLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 CLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 CLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 CLK-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →