2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2013 models.

- Class
- Subcompact Cars
- Body styles
- C250 4dr Sedan RWD, C250 Coupe 2dr, C300 / C350 4matic 4dr Sedan AWD, C350 4dr Sedan RWD
- Engines
- 1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Premium Gasoline, FFV
- MPG (best)
- 25 combined · 22 city / 31 hwy
- Length
- 180.3–182.3 in
- Curb weight
- 3,318–3,682 lb
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 15 similar 2013 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class is a subcompact car offered with 3 engines (1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl and 6.2L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 180 inches long and 70 inches wide on a 109-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,318 lb (C250 4dr Sedan RWD).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 25 MPG combined (22 city / 31 highway), 14% better than the 2013 subcompact car average of 22 MPG, for an estimated $3,300 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2013
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
Compared with 2012; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2012 C-Class →
Dimensions & weight
| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Track F / R | Curb weight | Weight F/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C250 4dr Sedan RWD | 180.3 in | 69.7 in | 56.7 in | 108.7 in | 59.8 / 59.1 in | 3,318 lb | 53/47 |
| C250 Coupe 2dr | 181.1 in | 69.7 in | 55.5 in | 108.7 in | 59.4 / 59.4 in | 3,417 lb | 53/47 |
| C300 / C350 4matic 4dr Sedan AWD | 182.3 in | 69.7 in | 56.7 in | 108.7 in | 59.8 / 59.1 in | 3,682 lb | 53/47 |
| C350 4dr Sedan RWD | 182.3 in | 69.7 in | 56.7 in | 108.7 in | 59.8 / 59.1 in | 3,549 lb | 53/47 |
| C350 4matic Coupe 2dr AWD | 181.1 in | 69.7 in | 55.5 in | 108.7 in | 59.4 / 59.4 in | 3,682 lb | 53/47 |
| C350 Coupe 2dr RWD | 181.1 in | 69.7 in | 55.5 in | 108.7 in | 59.4 / 59.4 in | 3,561 lb | 53/47 |
Transport Canada CVS (Open Government Licence – Canada), Canadian-market figures.
Will it fit your garage? Check with your measurements →Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C250 Coupe | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 21 / 31 / 25 | +14% | $3,300 | 356 |
| C250 | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 22 / 31 / 25 | -3% | $3,300 | 356 |
| C350 Coupe | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 20 / 28 / 23 | +5% | $3,550 | 384 |
| C350 FFV | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 20 / 28 / 23 | -11% | $3,550 | 384 |
| C350 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 20 / 28 / 23 | -11% | $3,550 | 384 |
| C350 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 20 / 29 / 23 | -11% | $3,550 | 378 |
| C350 4matic Coupe | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | 4-Wheel Drive | 19 / 27 / 22 | 0% | $3,750 | 400 |
| C300 4matic | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | 4-Wheel Drive | 19 / 28 / 22 | -15% | $3,750 | 398 |
| C300 4matic FFV | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | 4-Wheel Drive | 19 / 26 / 22 | -15% | $3,750 | 405 |
| C63 AMG Black Series Coupe | 6.2L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 13 / 19 / 16 | -27% | $5,150 | 574 |
| C63 AMG Coupe | 6.2L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 13 / 19 / 15 | -32% | $5,500 | 576 |
| C63 AMG | 6.2L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 13 / 19 / 15 | -42% | $5,500 | 576 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2013 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
Similar 2013 subcompact cars
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class (this car) | 25 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 BMW 3 Series | 28 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Lexus IS | 24 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2013 Volvo S60 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2013 Cadillac CTS | 21 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2013 BMW X1 | 27 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2013 Audi S4 | 21 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other C-Class years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 C-Class | 29 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 C-Class | 29 | 188.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 C-Class | 29 | 188.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 C-Class | 30 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 C-Class | 29 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 C-Class | 29 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 C-Class | 27 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 C-Class | 28 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 C-Class | 27 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 C-Class | 30 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 C-Class | 30 | 187 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 C-Class | 30 | 184.6 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →