2009 Land Rover LR2
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2009 models.

- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD
- Body styles
- 4dr SUV 4WD Se/Hse
- Engines
- 3.2L 6-cyl
- Drivetrain
- 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Regular Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 17 combined · 15 city / 22 hwy
- Length
- 177.2 in
- Curb weight
- 4,255 lb
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 8 similar 2009 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2009 Land Rover LR2 is a SUV - offered with a 3.2L 6-cyl engine and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 177 inches long and 75 inches wide on a 105-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,255 lb.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 17 MPG combined (15 city / 22 highway), 4% worse than the 2009 SUV - average of 17.7 MPG, for an estimated $3,950 a year in fuel.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 19 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the power train.
What changed for 2009
No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2008 LR2 — a carry-over year in the data.
Compared with 2008; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2008 LR2 →
Dimensions & weight
| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Track F / R | Curb weight | Weight F/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4dr SUV 4WD Se/Hse | 177.2 in | 75.2 in | 68.5 in | 104.7 in | 63 / 63 in | 4,255 lb | 57/43 |
Transport Canada CVS (Open Government Licence – Canada), Canadian-market figures.
Will it fit your garage? Check with your measurements →Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR2 | 3.2L 6-cyl | Automatic (S6) | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 15 / 22 / 17 | -4% | $3,950 | 523 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2009 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2009 Land Rover LR2 under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2009 SUV -s
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 (this car) | 17 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz G-Class | 12 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 BMW X3 | 20 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2009 Lexus RX | 20 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 Audi Q5 | 20 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2009 Volvo XC60 | 18 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2009 Acura RDX | 19 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2009 Land Rover LR2.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2009 Land Rover LR2 is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
Unverified owner reports; best-sellers collect more.
Used 2009 Land Rover LR2 buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Power Train — 17 owner reports. Test-drive through all gears, including reverse; note slipping, harsh or delayed shifts.
- Suspension — 4 owner reports. Drive over bumps and listen for clunks; look for uneven tire wear.
- Electrical System — 2 owner reports. Test every window, lock, light, screen and USB port; check the battery age.
- Mileage to watch. Owners typically reported problems around 74,000 miles; ask what was repaired near that point.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2009 Land Rover LR2. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other LR2 years
Compare all years →Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Land Rover. How we calculate this →