Ford Expedition vs Nissan Armada

2026 Ford Expedition vs 2026 Nissan Armada — two standard SUVs compared on efficiency, size, safety and reliability.

Ford Expedition

2026 Ford Expedition

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WDAWD/4WD
VS2 – 3Nissan Armada wins 3 of 5 categories
Nissan Armada

2026 Nissan Armada

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WDAWD/4WD

Swap in a different car →

The short version

The Ford Expedition is more fuel-efficient: 19 vs 18 MPG combined in its best version.

That works out to about $1,000 a year less in fuel for the Ford Expedition (EPA estimate, 15,000 miles).

Across all model years since 2005, the Nissan Armada has had fewer recall campaigns (16 vs 53).

The two cars

The 2026 Ford Expedition is a standard SUV offered with a 3.5L 6-cyl turbo engine and rear-wheel drive and part-time 4-wheel drive. It measures about 210 inches long and 80 inches wide on a 122-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 5,668 lb (4dr SUV).

The 2026 Nissan Armada is a standard SUV offered with a 3.5L 6-cyl turbo engine and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive. It measures about 210 inches long and 80 inches wide on a 121-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 6,080 lb (Platinum 4dr SUV).

Buying used? The 2024 Expedition and the 2024 Armada have the fewest problems in our data; avoid the 2020 Expedition and the 2019 Armada.

Basics

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Class
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Regular Gasoline
Fuel
Premium Gasoline
3.5L 6-cyl turbo
Engines
3.5L 6-cyl turbo
Rear-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive
Drivetrain
Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive

Efficiency

19 MPG
Best combined MPG
18 MPG
16 city
City / highway MPG (best)
16 city
$3,550
Fuel cost per year (EPA)
$4,550

Performance & space

–
Horsepower (most powerful)
460 hp
–
Seats (most)
8
209.8 in
Length
209.8 in
79.9 in
Width
79.9 in
78 in
Height
77.2 in
5,668 lb
Curb weight (lightest)
5,964 lb

Safety & reliability

11
Driver-assist features standard
15
2
Recalls (2026)
2
53
Recalls, all years since 2005
16
10
Owner complaints (latest year)
9

Interest

16,209
Wikipedia views, 30 days
8,708

Buying used

Best used year
Year to avoid

Green = clearly better. Prices are not included. How we calculate this →

Which one should you choose?

Choose the Ford Expedition if…

It doesn't clearly beat the Nissan Armada on any measure we track.

Choose the Nissan Armada if…

  • You want more standard driver-assist tech
  • You put reliability history first (16 vs 53 recalls since 2005)

Pros & cons of each

2026 Ford Expedition

  • AWD / 4WD available
  • Lots of standard safety tech4 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
  • Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 19 MPG combined, 12% below the 2026 standard SUV average of 21.7 MPG.

2026 Nissan Armada

  • Strong performanceUp to 460 hp, versus about 285 hp for similar 2026 models.
  • AWD / 4WD available
  • Seats up to 83 rows of seating.
  • Lots of standard safety tech5 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
  • Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 18 MPG combined, 17% below the 2026 standard SUV average of 21.7 MPG.
  • Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.

Full 2026 Ford Expedition specs →Full 2026 Nissan Armada specs →Compare fuel costs for your driving →Compare size & garage fit →