Chrysler Sebring
6 model years from 2005 to 2010, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2010
- Class
- Midsize Cars, Compact Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 22–24 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 4 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2008 (151)
The 2010 Sebring in brief
The 2010 Chrysler Sebring is a midsize car offered with 3 engines (2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl and 3.5L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 194 inches long and 72 inches wide on a 109-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,957 lb (Convertible Limited 2dr FWD).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 24 MPG combined (21 city / 30 highway), 8% better than the 2010 midsize car average of 22.2 MPG, for an estimated $2,800 a year in fuel.
It has 3 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 63 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the air bags.
The Chrysler Sebring has 6 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2010, classed as Midsize Cars, Compact Cars.
Its most efficient year was 2010 at 24 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 24 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the electrical system (143), air bags (114), engine (80).
2010 has the most recalls (3); all years together count 4 campaigns and 438 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Sebring compares
The 2005 Chrysler Sebring is a compact car offered with 3 engines (2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl and 2.7L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 193 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 106-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,355 lb (2dr Convertible FWD /Base/Gtc).
Sebring changes by model year
- 2009
- All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered
- 2008
- New body dimensions: 3.1 in longer — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine added: 3.5L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 3.5L 4-cyl
- All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
- 2007
- New body dimensions: 2.7 in shorter, wheelbase +2.8 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine added: 3.5L 4-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 22 to 24
- 2006
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG down from 24 to 22
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 6 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl | 24 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,957 lb | Not rated | 3 | 63 |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl | 24 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,957 lb | Not rated | 0 | 19 |
| 2008 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl | 24 MPG | 193.7 in | 3,957 lb | Not rated | 0 | 151 |
| 2007 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,309 lb | Not rated | 0 | 111 |
| 2006 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 193.3 in | 3,300 lb | Not rated | 0 | 53 |
| 2005 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl, 2.7L 6-cyl | 24 MPG | 193.3 in | 3,355 lb | Not rated | 1 | 41 |
Alternatives to the 2010 Sebring
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Ford Mustang | 21 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2010 Honda Accord | 25 MPG | Not rated | 13 |
| 2010 Chevrolet Impala | 22 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2010 Toyota Camry | 34 MPG | Not rated | 8 |
| 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | 22 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2010 Dodge Charger | 21 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chrysler. How we calculate this →