Chevrolet Van 15/25 Conversion
4 model years from 2005 to 2008, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2008
- Class
- Vans, Cargo Type
- Latest engines
- 5.3L 8-cyl
- Best MPG
- 14–14 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns, all years
The 2008 Van 15/25 Conversion in brief
The 2008 Chevrolet Van 15/25 Conversion is a van offered with a 5.3L 8-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 14 MPG combined (12 city / 16 highway), 5% worse than the 2008 van average of 14.8 MPG, for an estimated $4,800 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Chevrolet Van 15/25 Conversion has 4 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2008.
Its most efficient year was 2008 at 14 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 14 to 14 MPG.
How the 2005 Van 15/25 Conversion compares
The 2005 Chevrolet Van 15/25 Conversion is a van offered with 2 engines (4.3L 6-cyl and 5.3L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 14 MPG combined (13 city / 17 highway), 6% worse than the 2005 van average of 14.9 MPG, for an estimated $4,800 a year in fuel.
2008 Van 15/25 Conversion pros & cons
Full 2008 details →What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Van 15/25 Conversion changes by model year
- 2007
- Engine dropped: 4.3L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 4 model years side by side
Alternatives to the 2008 Van 15/25 Conversion
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Chevrolet Express Passenger | 14 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2008 GMC Savana Passenger | 14 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2008 GMC Savana Cargo | 17 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2008 Chevrolet Van 1500 | 14 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2008 Chevrolet Van 1500/2500 | 17 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chevrolet. How we calculate this →